Hillary, Why You Always Lying?

Hillary, Why You Always Lying?

• Previously Undisclosed Internal Memos Spell Out Criminal Case against Hillary Clinton Over 1990s Whitewater/ Castle Grande Land Transaction Scandal

• Previously Undisclosed Internal Memos Spell Out Criminal Case against Hillary Clinton Over 1990s Whitewater/ Castle Grande Land Transaction Scandal

Previously Undisclosed Internal Memos Spell Out Criminal Case against Hillary Clinton Over 1990s Whitewater/ Castle Grande Land Transaction Scandal We have a special Weekly Update for you today that you will want to keep in your files and share far and wide. Just yesterday, we released 246 pages of previously undisclosed Office of Independent Counsel (OIC) internal memos revealing extensive details about the investigation of Hillary Rodham Clinton for possible criminal charges involving her activities in the Whitewater/Castle Grande fraudulent land transaction scandal. (Links to the full set of documents are below.) The memos are "statements of the case" against Hillary Clinton and Webster Lee "Webb" Hubbell, Hillary Clinton's former law partner and former Associate Attorney General in the Clinton Justice Department. Ultimately, the memos show that prosecutors declined to prosecute Clinton because of the difficulty of persuading a jury to convict a public figure as widely known as Clinton. But it wasn't a lack of evidence of criminality that led to the decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton. Although some details of the documents were previously reported, Judicial Watch's disclosure was the first public release of the independent counsel's prosecution memos. The prosecution memos-portions of which are heavily redacted-were obtained from the National Archives and Records Administration through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. An April 10, 1998, memo summarizes "the crimes under consideration" What, then are the crimes under consideration? Between January 1994 and February 1996 both Hillary Clinton and [Webster] Hubbell made numerous sworn statements to the RTC, the FDIC, the Senate and the House of Representatives, and to the OIC. Each of these reflected and embodied materially inaccurate stories relating to: how RLF [Clinton and Hubbell's Rose Law Firm] came to be retained by MGSL [the Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan]; Hillary Clinton's role in the IDC/Castle Grande venture; Hillary Clinton's role in representing MGSL; Hillary Clinton's role in representing MGSL before state agencies; Hubbell's representations to the RTC [Resolution Trust Corporation] and FDIC regarding Hillary Clinton's role in the IDC/Castle Grande venture; and the removal of records from the RLF. The question, generally, is not whether the statements are inaccurate, but whether they are willfully so. The records released yesterday by JW were prepared for an "All OIC Attorneys" meeting on April 27, 1998, at which a final decision about whether to indict Clinton and Hubbell was the subject of a lengthy debate. The records explore in detail the role Clinton played in the fraudulent Castle Grande transaction, the role of Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan, and the subsequent lengthy cover-up as the Clintons sought and won the White House. Clinton, according to prosecutors, drafted an option agreement that concealed from federal bank examiners a fraudulent $300,000 cross-loan in the Castle Grande transaction. Her concealment of her role in this fraudulent transaction, including the hiding of her Rose Law Firm billing records concerning her legal work for Madison, was the subject of an OIC obstruction of justice probe. The 1998 memoranda include substantial evidence depicting Clinton and her former Rose Law Firm partners-Hubbell and Vincent Foster, both of whom went on to senior positions in the Bill Clinton presidency-as complicit in activities that "facilitated crimes." Page 18 of the OIC documents notes that Clinton "destroyed" her personal records of her work for Madison Guaranty. Page 39 of the documents notes: Section II contains a chronological background and contextual summary of the investigation so that the facts relating to possible obstruction can be placed in the context of the ongoing investigation by OIC. The evidence in the new documents covers: Castle Grande. "The Castle Grande transactions were crimes." The statement is followed by an explicit six-paragraph dissection of the land-flipping scheme. Madison Guaranty S&L. Clinton minimized the role she played in seeking state regulatory assistance for the corrupt savings and loan, headed by key Clinton financial and political supporter James McDougal. At the time, Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas. Vincent Foster and the Missing Rose Law Firm Billing Records. The Rose records were a key piece of evidence in the probe. They were missing for years. After Foster's July 1993 suicide, the OIC documents note, where the billing records went "is an open question.... Several pieces of evidence support the inference that personal documents which Hillary Clinton did not want disclosed were located in Foster's office at the time of his death and then removed." Removal of Records from Vincent Foster's Office. "[O]n the afternoon of July 21st Bernard Nussbaum, then White House Counsel, initially agreed to allow two career DOJ employees to review the documents in Foster's office for evidence that might shed light on the cause of his death. That evening and the next morning Nussbaum, Hillary Clinton, Susan Thomases, and Maggie Williams (Hillary Clinton's chief of staff) exchanged 10 separate phones calls ... That morning, according to the DOJ employees, Nussbaum changed his mind and refused to allow the DOJ prosecutors to review the documents; instead, he reviewed them himself and segregated several as 'personal' to the Clintons." Hiding the Billing Records. "On the evening of July 22nd, Thomas Castleton ... assisted Williams [Maggie Williams, Hillary Clinton chief of staff] in carrying a box of personal documents up to ... a closet in Hillary Clinton's office. The closet is approximately 30 feet from the table in the Book Room, where the billing records were found 2 years later.... There is a circumstantial case that the records were left on the table by Hillary Clinton. She is the only individual in the White House who had a significant interest in them and she is one of only 3 people known to have had them in her possession since their creation in February 1992." Buying the Silence of a Co-Conspirator? Hubbell, criticized by the OIC for his lack of cooperation with the probe, received several "jobs" from Clinton supporters for which he apparently did little or no work. During a taped conversation in prison, Hubbell appears to acknowledge that he withheld information from the OIC. Several of Hubbell's job-providers fell most strongly within the hush money allegation. The OIC notes eight of them on page 197. The Missing Draft Indictment. More than 60 pages of the OIC memoranda are completely censored, withheld by the National Archives. Multiple sources tell Judicial Watch that these pages include a full draft indictment of Clinton and Hubbell, as well as a detailed "order of Evidence" list. Despite this document dump, the National Archives is withholding additional documents Judicial Watch believes to be critical to understanding Clinton's full role in the Whitewater scandal. On March 9, 2015, Judicial Watch submitted a FOIA request seeking all draft indictments of Clinton in the files of Hickman Ewing Jr., who served as deputy independent counsel in the Whitewater probe. In 1999, Ewing testified that he wrote a draft indictment of Clinton. On March 19, 2015, the National Archives admitted locating records responsive to the Ewing material request, confirming that it found 38 pages of responsive records in a folder entitled "Draft Indictment," and approximately 200 pages of responsive records in a folder entitled "Hilary Rodham Clinton/Webster L. Hubbell Draft Indictment." We are now in federal court to force the release of the draft indictment, which is being withheld by the National Archives to protect the privacy of Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton is a public figure running for president of the United States. Why would her alleged privacy outweigh the public interest in a draft indictment of her by federal prosecutors! Ultimately, as an April 24, 1998, memo suggests, prosecutors were persuaded that a jury would not convict Clinton based upon circumstantial evidence. OIC attorney Paul Rosenzweig wrote: In a high profile case of this sort, however, I think that some jurors are likely to put OIC to the full measure of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and, in effect, insist that circumstantial evidence is an inferior form of evidence on which they cannot convict. Such a distinction would be "lawless" in a formal sense, as contrary to their jury instructions - but we blink reality if we do not expect this reaction to a primarily circumstantial high profile case. The prosecutor concluded: Bottom line: We can anticipate the following: 2% = Rule 29; 18% = Acquittal; 70%=Hung Jury; 10% = Conviction. Not enough in my view. These new Hillary Clinton prosecution memos are damning and dramatic. Hillary Clinton's bank fraud, obstruction, lies, and other fraud began in Arkansas, continued in the White House and actually accelerated because the suicide of her friend Vincent Foster. The memos suggest that if she weren't First Lady, she would have been successfully prosecuted in federal court. As we continue the court fight to get the actual draft indictment of Hillary Clinton we first uncovered in this investigation, Americans would do well to read these memos. If you want to understand the deplorable ethics and corruption at Hillary Clinton's State Department, these documents provide important background. We have more on this topic coming soon, so be sure to check in. In the meantime, you have a weekend's worth of educational reading, as good as any potboiler, about the corruption of Hillary Clinton (and her co-conspirator, Bill). Links to the complete set of documents are available here: Part one of "HRC Meeting" NARA Whitewater OIC document Part two of "HRC Meeting" NARA Whitewater OIC document Part three of "HRC Meeting" NARA Whitewater OIC document Part four of "HRC Meeting" NARA Whitewater OIC document Part five of "HRC Meeting" NARA Whitewater OIC document Part six of "HRC Meeting" NARA Whitewater OIC document NYPD Prioritizes Sensitivity toward Muslims over Public Safety Advocates for terrorists control the debate, and too often, the policies of how to counter the threat from Islamic terrorism. These special interest groups, ranging from the ACLU to terrorist fronts such as Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), have law enforcement on a leash. Our Corruption Chronicles blog reported the latest assault on our security in which the New York City Police Department was targeted by the Left because of an effective anti-terrorist program focused upon radical Muslims: The New York Police Department (NYPD) is the latest of several law enforcement agencies-including the FBI-to succumb to the pressure of Islamic groups demanding changes in anti-terrorism investigations and training they claim discriminate against Muslims. As part of a court settlement announced this month the NYPD will purge a highly acclaimed report (Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat) that's proven to be a critical tool in terrorism investigations. The NYPD will also limit the use of undercover officers and informants in Muslim communities and create a policy that bans religious discrimination. The department will "provide additional guidance to police officers at part of a settlement of lawsuits accusing the NYPD of improperly investigating Muslim groups," according to a statement issued by the law enforcement agency. The change comes on the heels of an increase in terrorism attacks by radicals associated with groups like the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). The settlement stems from a 2013 lawsuit filed by three New York Muslims, two mosques and a Muslim nonprofit accusing the NYPD of "discriminatory surveillance" after 9/11. Muslim communities and their institutions were singled out and officers and informants were deployed to mosques to surveil innocent religious leaders and followers, the lawsuit alleges. The department also employed invasive tactics to spy on area Muslims, according to the complaint. The now-censored report "stigmatizes an entire faith community and invites discrimination," the Muslim plaintiffs claim in their suit. The 90-page NYPD report says that most Islamic terrorists in the West start as "unremarkable people" who become religious and radical in a four-stage process. "Many of the terrorist attacks or thwarted plots against cities in Europe, Canada, Australia and the United States have been conceptualized and planned by local residents/citizens who sought to attack their country of residence," the 2007 NYPD report says. "The majority of these individuals began as "unremarkable" - they had "unremarkable" jobs, had lived "unremarkable" lives and had little, if any criminal history." After the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris, a New York newspaper published a story documenting how the brothers who carried out the attack fit the profile of homegrown terrorists outlined in the NYPD's "prescient but controversial" document. The now-banned report was created to provide law enforcement agencies and legislators with information related to the operations of domestic terrorists after the 9/11 attacks. It was put together by the NYPD Intelligence Division under former police Commissioner Ray Kelly. The city's agreement to delete it from the NYPD's website is a "blatant act of cowardliness," according to Patrick Dunleavy, the former deputy inspector general of the New York State prisons' criminal intelligence division. Dunleavy worked with the NYPD's intelligence division for several years and assures there was no bias in the department's anti-terrorism work. "Seeing the NYPD and city officials caving in to the demands of a few is most disheartening," Dunleavy writes in a recently published piece. This appears to be a frightening trend that Judicial Watch has reported on extensively in the last few years. Muslim rights groups, especially the terrorist front organization CAIR, have proven they wield tremendous power in the Obama administration. This is especially true when it comes to the way the nation's law enforcement agencies conduct anti-terrorism training. In fact, it was CAIR that got the FBI to purge anti-terrorism material determined to be offensive to Muslims. Judicial Watch uncovered that scandal a few years ago and obtained hundreds of pages of FBI documents with details of the arrangement. JW also published a special in-depth report in 2015. CAIR and its allies also got several police departments in President Obama's home state of Illinois to cancel essential counterterrorism courses over accusations that the instructor was anti-Muslim. The course was called "Islamic Awareness as a Counter-Terrorist Strategy" and departments in Lombard, Elmhurst and Highland Park caved into CAIR's demands. Just a few months ago Islamic activists got the FBI to suspend a new internet program aimed at preventing the radicalization of youth because Muslim and Arab rights groups determined that it discriminates against Muslims and will lead to bullying, bias and religious profiling of students. This is one of those stories that makes one ask: Is there anything our own public officials are doing now that paid foreign agents hostile to the U.S. would do differently? Until next week... Tom Fitton President

Police heap pressure on Canadian crime family by seizing $1.4M in properties

Police pressure on a self-made crime group built by five gangster brothers continued as authorities seized real estate housing a restaurant in Ontario and a nightclub in Quebec from the Alkhalil organization, claiming the buildings are the proceeds of crime. Authorities restrained the Abu Abed Café at the corner of Olmstead and Gladu streets in Ottawa,…

Steven Seagal: Mass Shootings in the US are "Engineered"

There are few issues right now more contentious than gun control. One of these issues happens to be “false flag” operations. Actor Steven Seagal has previously sounded off on both. In an interview with RT, the action star-turned second amendment fundamentalist claimed “a lot” of domestic shootings in America were “engineered” in order to drum up support for gun control legislation.





In the video, Steven Seagal speaks forthrightly about his belief that there is a concerted effort by the government to violate our rights as part of an assault on the constitution:

“I believe in the second amendment and our constitution more than anything in the world, and I think that Adolf Hitler – for example — when he wanted to annihilate the people of Germany — the first thing he did was to take away their guns.

And the right to bear arms wasn’t just to protect the people from foreign invaders, it was to protect them from evil governments, and anyone that would violate their inherited rights as human beings.”

He continues, “I believe that, and I hate to say this, a lot of these mass murders and all this funny stuff that’s going on, I believe a lot of this is engineered.”

The conspiracy theory surrounding domestic false flag shootings conjures intense emotions on both sides. “Truthers” claim the government uses either CIA operatives or patsies controlled by MKULTRA style psyops in order to foment violence so abhorrent that Americans will be forced to embrace gun control legislation. They believe the end-game of such an insidious scheme is to disarm the general population in advance of extensive martial law or indefinite FEMA detention.

Whether any of this theory is true or not is endlessly debatable but highly unlikely. Theorists who claim every mass shooting is a government conspiracy — without providing concrete proof — detract from the documented fact that governments do partake in conspiracies and false flag operations.

However, while the mechanism by which domestic shootings could be “engineered” is still unknown, the MKULTRA program is an established historical fact. Researchers are still uncovering CIA connections from this time period, but we do know experimental subjects included Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber.

An explosive new report Hillary Clinton instructedt her Techs to delete ....

An explosive new report suggests that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or her team may have instructed tech companies involved with managing and storing her emails to delete some

Where Will the Classified Info Spilled by Hillary Clinton Turn Up Next?

October 8, 2015|Matt Wolking

An explosive new report suggests that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or her team may have instructed tech companies involved with managing and storing her emails to delete some records after she was told to turn them over to the State Department, which needed to comply with documents requests made by the Select Committee on Benghazi. One tech employee was suspicious that Clinton's team “really is covering up some shaddy (sic) (expletive).”
The new revelations are in addition to the FBI expanding its investigation to include a second data company, and serve as further evidence that Clinton’s unprecedented and exclusive use of a private, unsecure computer server and personal email account for official government business meant classified information related to foreign affairs and America’s national security was routinely exposed.
The U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual defines “classified information spillage” as “When classified data is processed or received on an information system with a lower level of classification.”
The Department of Homeland Security Sensitive Systems Handbook states that “Examples include e-mailing a classified document from an account authorized to process up to SECRET to another account only authorized to process unclassified material, or saving a SECRET document onto a thumb drive or CD on a secure workstation and uploading it to a sensitive but unclassified (SBU) workstation.”
Despite her denials, it has been well-established that there was lots of classified information in Clinton’s email:

• There was information that was later classified before being released by the State Department.
• There were emails that “contained classified information when they were generated,” according to the Inspectors General of the Intelligence Community and the State Department.
• There were emails that contained “Top Secret” information when they were received, according to the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.
• There were emails that contained “information shared in confidence by foreign government officials,” which “must be classified from the start, and handled through secure, government-controlled channels,” according to U.S. government regulations.

This classified information was not just located on a secret server in the Clintons’ private New York home, which Hillary Clinton had touted as secure because it was “property guarded by the Secret Service.” It has been digitally spilled around the Internet and physically moved to locations around the country:

• Stacks and stacks of boxes on a truck, which is how Clinton delivered all of the emails she chose to print and turn over to the State Department.
• The D.C. office of David Kendall, Clinton’s lawyer, where he kept a thumb drive with copies of her emails outside of a safe before one was installed. The thumb drive was eventually taken by the FBI.
• “A third party data center” in New Jersey, where the Clintons’ home server was warehoused in 2013. The server was eventually taken by the FBI.
• A Colorado-based company, Platte River Networks, which took over management of Clinton’s private email network in 2013.
• A Connecticut-based company, Datto Inc., which stored backups of Clinton’s emails on a “cloud” storage system and is now cooperating with the FBI’s investigation.
• The Clinton Foundation, where staff received classified information in emails from Clinton’s chief of staff, Cheryl Mills.
• Computers at the State Department, which the FBI seized several weeks ago.
• Servers at commercial email providers like Google and AOL, which were conduits for Clinton emails containing classified information.
• The personal email account of Sidney Blumenthal, who was hacked by Guccifer in 2013. Blumenthal did not have a security clearance and he was barred from working in the Obama administration by President Obama’s first chief of staff, but that didn’t stop Clinton from paying him as an unofficial, secret advisor on the side.

Where will the classified information spilled by Hillary Clinton turn up next?
The Associated Press reports that “Clinton's private email server … was the subject of attempted cyberattacks originating in China, South Korea and Germany after she left office in early 2013. … While the attempts were apparently blocked by a ‘threat monitoring’ product that Clinton's employees connected to her network in October 2013, there was a period of more than three months from June to October 2013 when that protection had not been installed[.]”
A separate report last week detailed how “Russia-linked hackers tried at least five times to pry into Hillary Rodham Clinton's private email account while she was secretary of state[.]”
And now The Washington Post reports that “A technology subcontractor that has worked on Hillary Rodham Clinton’s e-mail setup expressed concerns over the summer that the system was inadequately protected and vulnerable to hackers, a company official said Wednesday.


Source

Arming Illegals

Visit Our Daily Newsletter at TheRedPill.Website

Obama Could Be Facing 10 Years to Life in Prison

Shepard Smith asked Judge Andrew Napolitano whether or not the Taliban prisoner exchange was legal under the NDAA H.R. 1960 Statute. The judge explained that the swap was illegal because taxpayer dollars were spent to remove these prisoners from Guantanamo Bay without giving Congress 30 days notice. However, Napolitano goes a step further by pointing out that Obama has provided material assistance (human assets) to the Taliban, which has been identified by Congress to be a non-state terrorist organization. This is a crime punishable by imprisonment of 10 years to life, which covers all Americans--including the President.

Visit Our Daily Newsletter at TheRedPill.Website