The Elite are Preparing/World Warning

(TRP) Planetary Weapons and Military Weather Mod.


 














More Pictures

What is CERN? In 60 seconds

The Event, Obama ordered 3 nuclear weapons to be transferred from their storage facilities

The Event:
President Obama ordered 3 nuclear weapons to be transferred from their storage facilities and to be relocated to three other bases. He also ordered the move of a number of missile bodies to those same locations and additionally the "collars" that would attach a particular type of warhead to these same missile bodies. Fact - the missiles were short range (800 mile max) missiles and the collars were those that attach a specific style of EMP (Electromagnetic pulse), producing warhead. The patriots put together what the missiles would be used for and against whom. They clearly saw the preparations as aimed at the American homeland and its people. The devastation that would be wreaked would result in the deaths of 90% of the American population in the aftermath over the next two years. A courageous Admiral and two Generals interfered with the plans and 1 nuke was detonated 560 miles southeast of Charleston in the deep ocean. The other two nukes are still in the hands of patriots. The Admiral and Generals sacrificed their careers and future lives of ease for the nation. That is the stuff of "Medal of Honor" winners. Of note is the fact that only myself and Vladimir Putin questioned publicly the detonation of the nuke in violation of treaty.
I want to underscore that fact that these two nukes are in patriot hands and will never be sold or given to our enemies. They remain a neutralizing force against Obama and any thoughts of his to devastate America. Heroes parried his intended massacre and remain vigilant in their position of strength. Since that time and those days Obama has been weaker and less "haughty and in control". Many have commented on the change in his demeanour. Now you know why that is. When the bully gets his nose bloodied in the school yard, he isn't as cocky anymore. Semper Fi.

 Source/Contributors

Obama's nuclear deal with Iran is the worst deal possible because Iran probably already has the bomb.

SUMMARY:  Obama's nuclear deal with Iran is the worst deal possible because Iran probably already has the bomb.  All 10 nuclear weapon states developed A-Bombs in 3-12 years, while Iran has been crashing on the bomb for 30 years.  Nuclear testing to develop A-Bombs and even more sophisticated H-Bombs is unnecessary as component testing is sufficient.  After getting the A-Bomb, timeline for H-Bomb development is 3-8 years, so Iran has been working long enough for more sophisticated nuclear weapons.  Russia and North Korea are helping Iran, potentially accelerating Iran's developmental timeline for nuclear weapons and long-range missiles.  Although the IAEA is too timorous to say so, evidence in the IAEA's 2011 report is a "smoking gun" that Iran does have a nuclear weapon program--and probably nuclear weapons.  U.S. intelligence community leaders are too partisan to be trusted to give an objective assessment of Iran's nuclear weapons program to Congress and the American people.  If Iran already has the bomb--unless we or our allies have excellent intelligence on the location of all their weapons and very high confidence that they can be destroyed--then large-scale military operations to disarm Iran are too risky.  Iran and North Korea becoming nuclear weapon states requires the United States to invent a new national security strategy that relies less on blunt military force and more on the "black arts" of intelligence and the more subtle weapons of statecraft to achieve regime change.  But the Obama Administration is unlikely to pursue such a strategy or other necessary measures, except perhaps hardening the electric grid against nuclear EMP attack--which is the worst threat.  Obama's nuclear deal profoundly misunderstands Iran's ideology and nuclear capabilities, and therefore greatly increases the risk of a nuclear holocaust.           
President Obama's nuclear deal with Iran is not only a bad deal, but the worst deal possible--because Iran probably already has the bomb.
Consider the facts.

Iran A-Bomb Overdue

Historically, judging from open source estimates, the time required for all other nations to develop atomic weapons is 3-12 years.  Iran, which has had a nuclear program for over six decades and been crashing on the bomb for 25-30 years, should have developed atomic weapons by now.
For example:
The United States during the World War II Manhattan Project (1942-1945) built the first atomic bombs, two different designs, in just 3 years.  In just 3 years, when the atomic bomb was merely a theoretical possibility, the U.S. invented the two basic A-Bomb designs--the gun-type A-Bomb used on Hiroshima and the implosion-type A-Bomb used on Nagasaki--that are the basis for all atomic (fission) weapons and are the technological gateway to more sophisticated and powerful thermonuclear (fusion) weapons, including the H-Bomb.  In just 3 years, the U.S. invented and built the nuclear scientific and industrial infrastructure that mass produced thousands of A-Bombs and H-Bombs after 1945 during the Cold War.
Read Richard Rhodes' The Making of the Atomic Bomb (1987) and consider whether it seems plausible that--where the U.S. invented the bomb and its nuclear weapons infrastructure in just 3 years using 1930s and 1940s era science and technology--supposedly (according to the Obama Administration) Iran has not yet duplicated the U.S. feat of World War II.  Yet Iran has access to copious unclassified materials on making and designing fission and fusion weapons.  Yet Iran is informed and equipped with 21st Century science and technology.  And Iran has been crashing on the bomb for 8-10 times longer than the U.S. WWII Manhattan Project--for 25-30 years.
Consider also that all other nuclear weapon states, some of them poorer and less sophisticated than Iran, have developed atomic weapons in 12 years or less:       
--The USSR's atomic bomb project (1943-1949) tested its first A-Bomb in 6 years.
--The United Kingdom's A-bomb (1940-1952), slowed by politics and a bad economy, took 12 years.  Mistakenly believing that their scientific and material contributions to the Manhattan Project would entitle the U.K. to share the A-Bomb with the U.S., when their hope was disappointed, the United Kingdom, economically shattered by World War II and politically divided by the peace, working on their own tested their first A-Bomb in 7 years.    
--France independently, unassisted by anybody, developed A-Bombs (1956-1960) in 4 years.
 --China's A-Bombs (1955-1964) took 9 years.
--Israel, at the time a nation less populous than Chicago, is variously estimated to have built A-Bombs (1956/59-1966) in 7-10 years.  (A declassified CIA report retrieved and reported by the Nuclear Threat Initiative on June 3, 2009, assesses that Israel built its first atomic weapons in December 1966).
--India built A-Bombs (1967-1972) in 5 years.
--South Africa built A-Bombs (1967-1977/79) in 10-12 years.  South Africa also designed a nuclear warhead for delivery by its medium-range missiles, before abandoning its nuclear weapons program.
--Pakistan tested for political reasons in 1998, but developed and deployed bombs much earlier (1972-1984) in 12 years.  (According to a letter from A.Q. Khan, the father of Pakistan's atomic bomb, to General Zia al Haq, Pakistan's President, they had a uranium bomb by 1984.)
--North Korea tested in 2006, but developed a nuclear arsenal of bombs and missiles much earlier (1984-1992/94) in 8-10 years.  (In an open hearing before Congress on January 25, 1994, then Director of Central Intelligence R. James Woolsey testified that North Korea had already built a small number of atomic weapons, and would continue to build more.)
Iran started a nuclear program under the Shah in the 1950s, some 65 years ago.  Revolutionary Iran began a crash program on atomic weapons, their version of the Manhattan Project, during the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988).
President Obama claims the Mullahs still do not have atomic weapons, even though Iran has been working on the bomb for 65 years, crashing on the bomb for 25-30 years.  Yet  other nuclear weapon states, all ten of them, developed the bomb in 3-12 years.
Given everything we know about the history of nuclear weapons development and Iran's capabilities, the assessment that Iran does not yet have the bomb seems based more on wishful thinking than on prudence.

Nuclear Testing Unnecessary

Doesn't Iran need a full-yield explosive test to prove its nuclear weapon?
No.  Component testing is sufficient.
The U.S. never tested the Hiroshima gun-type uranium bomb--Hiroshima was the test.  The 1945 Trinity test at Alamogordo was of a more complicated implosion plutonium bomb used on Nagasaki, and it worked perfectly both times, at Trinity and Nagasaki.  Israel and South Africa clandestinely deployed nuclear weapons without testing.  Pakistan and North Korea deployed nuclear weapons years prior to testing.
The U.S. has not performed any nuclear test since 1992, 23 years ago, even though its aged  weapons are being patched together and maintained using different materials and makeshift components--becoming over the years essentially different nuclear weapons from those that were originally deployed brand new decades ago.  So the U.S. should know from its own experience that even highly sophisticated thermonuclear H-Bombs can be made and fielded for use without nuclear testing.

Iranian H-Bomb?

The A-Bomb is the technological gateway to more sophisticated nuclear weapons, including the H-Bomb.  H-Bombs can be hundreds of times more powerful than the A-Bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The historical record indicates that, once the A-Bomb is achieved, development of the H-Bomb can be achieved in 3-8 years:
The U.S., after developing the first A-Bombs in 1945, tested the first H-Bomb in 1952--7 years later.
The USSR tested its A-Bomb in 1949 and its H-Bomb in 1953--4 years later.
The United Kingdom tested its A-Bomb in 1952 and its H-Bomb in 1957--5 years later.
France, after testing its A-Bomb in 1960, tested its H-Bomb in 1968--8 years later.
China, after its first A-Bomb test in 1964, tested its H-Bomb in 1967--3 years later.
India claimed that it tested a low-yield fusion (H-Bomb) weapon among its virtually simultaneous 5 nuclear tests in 1998.  Pakistan allegedly tested a boosted-fission weapon (more sophisticated than an implosion A-Bomb) among its 6 near simultaneous tests competing with India in 1998.  Pakistan claimed it could build H-Bombs in 3-6 years.  So many tests conducted at once indicates both India and Pakistan were drawing from a stockpile of weapons developed and deployed long before the tests.  
In 1986, Israeli nuclear scientist Mordechai Vanunu defected to the United Kingdom and provided evidence, reported in the press, that Israel has a wide array of sophisticated atomic and thermonuclear weapons.  The respected Wisconsin Project estimates that Israel has the H-Bomb as well as small battlefield nuclear weapons, deliverable by artillery, including Enhanced Radiation Warheads (also called neutron warheads or the N-Bomb, designed to minimize explosive yield to reduce collateral damage to buildings, while maximizing output of neutrons and other radiation lethal to people.  The N-Bomb was originally intended to stop Soviet tanks invading Western Europe while minimizing damage to civilian infrastructure.)    In 1983, years before the Vanunu defection, Sam Cohen, the inventor of the U.S. N-Bomb who had very close ties to Israel, told me that he knew for a fact that Israel has the H-Bomb and neutron warheads.  

Source/Contributors 

Click for Newsletter

Argentinian President addresses UN with claims about the Obama Administration

The President of Argentina, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, spoke for nearly forty minutes at the United Nation’s 70th General Assembly Monday, during which time she provided to attendees a shocking tidbit of information.
During her speech President Kirchner said that Gary Samore, former White House Coordinator for Arms Control and Weapons of Mass Destruction under the Obama Administration until 2013, approached Argentinians in 2010 trying to convince them to provide Iranians with nuclear fuel — a claim that Samore didn’t bother to deny.
President Kirchner told the UN:

In 2010 we were visited in Argentina by Gary Samore, at that time the White House’s top advisor in nuclear issues. He came to see us in Argentina with a mission, with an objective: under the control of IAEA, the international organization in the field of weapons control and nuclear regulation, Argentina had supplied in the year 1987, during the first democratic government, the nuclear fuel for the reactor known as “Teheran”. Gary Samore had explained to our Minister of Foreign Affairs, Héctor Timerman, that negotiations were underway for the Islamic Republic of Iran to cease with its uranium enrichment activities or to do it to a lesser extent but Iran claimed that it needed to enrich this Teheran nuclear reactor and this was hindering negotiations. They came to ask us, Argentines, to provide the Islamic Republic of Iran with nuclear fuel. Rohani was not in office yet. It was Ahmadinejad’s administration and negotiations had already started.

You see according to the Belfer Center as a WMD Coordinator, Samore, “served as the principal advisor to the President on all matters relating to arms control and the prevention of weapons of mass destruction proliferation and WMD terrorism, and coordinated United States government activities, initiatives, and programs to prevent proliferation and WMD terrorism and promote international arms control efforts.” So you can clearly see how if the allegations President Kirchner made are true there is a definite conflict of interest here.
Let me reiterate this — a former Obama Admin. Official, Gary Samore, has been accused of trying to facilitate a secret deal for the Iranians to obtain nuclear fuel! Moreover when the Argentinians requested that the deal be put into writing Samore backed out later approaching agents of several other countries seeking a similar deal.
Ladies and gentlemen, if true, this can only mean one thing; that the Obama Admin was, and possibly still is, trying to actively arm Iran making them nuclear capable. And if that’s the case, which we may never know for sure, we can go even one step further and say that Samore’s actions may have been an attempt by the Obama Admin to conjure up another 9/11 on U.S. soil — this time in the form of a mushroom cloud.

Also see  World Leaders Ask America To Impeach Obama for THIS

Source/Contributor 

Amazon Trade-in: Get Top Dollar for Your Phone

Visit Our Daily Newsletter at TheRedPill.Website

Buy me!