Showing posts with label Trey Gowdy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trey Gowdy. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

Past FBI Director James Comey has no integrity

Director James Comey has no integrity, has facilitated the criminal acts of many in high places within the Obama Administration, undermines the Trump Administration at every opportunity and lied not only to Congress but to the American people

Democrats were pressuring for an independent counsel with Comey yesterday and they are doing the same today after Comey was fired.
Let's say we get one for the Russian's influence and get one for the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton emails. You know, 3 for one!

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe will take over for Comey while a replacement is sought.

Trey Gowdy is our pick and is a former prosecutor and currently, serves on the U.S. House of Representatives for South Carolina’s 4th congressional district. He’s a member of the Tea Party movement and also served as a solicitor for South Carolina’s Seventh Judicial Circuit.

Gowdy was a federal prosecutor for the U.S. Attorney for the District of South Carolina from 1994-2000.

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Rep. Trey Gowdy, Journalist Sharyl Attkisson, and the Benghazi Families Unite Against Hillary Clinton!


As Hillary Clinton’s email scandal continues to unravel and it grows ever more likely that she will be indicted for criminal activities from her time as Secretary of State, the Benghazi scandal is also heating up. While two separate investigations are being conducted on the activities around the State Department, the two investigations are also inextricably linked by the bad behavior of Hillary Clinton and her cronies.
Over the last week, Clinton and her allies have faced fire from three different angles of the Benghazi/Email scandal story. Congressman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) explained that the testimony seems to contradict the Obama administration (and State Department) story about what happened on the ground in Benghazi. Journalist Sharyl Attkisson agrees with Gowdy, saying that the evidence is now “overwhelming” and proves that the government has lied to us about what happened. Finally, the families of the Benghazi dead and those who survived are beginning to fight back against Hillary Clinton’s attempts to paint them as either liars or simpletons.
First, Attkisson lays out the argument that the government is lying about how the situation in Benghazi played out.




“We also spoke to sources and have some email evidence that talks about special forces that were not far away in Europe that we were told were assigned to respond in the event of a case just like this, and yet were turned back according to witnesses. This is something that the president and the White House has steadfastly denied, but there’s now what I would call an overwhelming body of evidence that leads us to believe that somebody stopped a number of teams and potential rescuers from entering Libya or going to Benghazi to help while those attacks were underway. They could have gotten there. According to experts and people that have information that we spoke to, they could have gotten there before the last two Americans died. Those attacks went on for eight hours…
We spoke to, again a CIA team leader expert, an anti-terrorism expert who says the only person who stops those forces that spun up automatically without waiting to be told—the only force is the commander in chief, slash the White House, an authority that comes from him.”
Here’s some of that email evidence, which was uncovered in December, showing that the Pentagon was ready to defend Benghazi and contradicting both Hillary Clinton and Leon Panetta, who have said that no troops were available to help in Benghazi.
Then, Congressman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) spoke to the idea that no “stand down” order was ever given. In the aftermath of the Benghazi attack, numerous reports emerged that the military contractors in Benghazi were explicitly ordered not to help at the consulate. The Obama administration and the State Department both argued that no order was ever given, but the evidence against this story continues to grow.
"The best I can do is tell you what the witnesses say, and then you can decide who you think is more credible," Gowdy said during an interview with Boston Herald Radio…
Gowdy said "there were no assets that could have gotten there" in time to save Ambassador Chris Stevens and Sean Smith, two Benghazi victims who died of smoke inhalation earlier in the evening of Sept. 11, 2012.
But he noted the question of whether assets could have arrived in time to save the other two victims, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, was "eminently fair."
Clinton-Benghazi"I don't know why the mainstream media doesn't understand that you have to talk to everyone before you draw conclusions," Gowdy said.
The soldiers who were there have already said this over and over, and it’s basically their word against the word of the politicians who made the mess.
“There is no sensationalism in that: We were told to ‘stand down,’” said former Special Forces Officer Kris Paronto, one of the CIA contractors who fought that night, in an interview with Politico. “Those words were used verbatim — 100 percent. … If the truth of it affects someone’s political career? Well, I’m sorry. It happens…
The words were used,” Paronto said. “I don’t know what to tell you; I don’t know how they can continuously call us liars, which is what they’re doing, in effect.”
Lastly, the Benghazi families have teamed with the soldiers about another aspect of the scandal that has our government calling the heroes and their families liars. One of the most convoluted aspects of the Benghazi scandal had to do with the disgusting excuses made by Clinton’s State Department in the immediate aftermath of the attack. Clinton and her team tried to sell the country on a story that the attack had nothing to do with Al Qaeda terrorists and was simply a riot spurred on by a stupid YouTube video.
Today, we know that this was all a smokescreen, a lie, and that no one in the government ever believed that the video had anything to do with the attack. In fact, within hours of the first bullet being fired we knew that the perpetrators were from Ansar al Sharia (Libya’s wing of Al Qaeda), and that it was a planned and coordinated terrorist attack. Now, the Benghazi families are telling the country that Hillary Clinton told them something very different, and she in turn has called them “liars.”
Recently during a Fox News interview when Megyn Kelly asked Sean Smith’s mother, Patricia Smith, if she might have just been confused and misunderstood what Clinton had told her, Smith grew angry.
Benghazi Lies“Bullfeathers! That’s just plain old bull. I know what she said, and not only did she say it, but Obama said the same thing to me, and Panetta, and Biden, and Susan Rice… I went up to all of them, begging them to tell me what happened, and they all said that it was the video. Every one of them.”
Later Smith told Kelly that she wanted to see Hillary in jail for the way she handled herself and the situation. “She’s been lying.  She’s turned the whole country into a bunch of liars.”
But perhaps the most glaring proof that the Benghazi families aren’t confused or lying came when the father of Tyrone Woods, Charles Woods, showed Kelly and her viewers his personal datebook/journal which showed what he wrote on the day he met with Hillary Clinton:
“I gave Hillary a hug and shook her hand and she said ‘we are going to have the film maker arrested who was responsible for the death of my son.’”
It’s an odd thing for him to write if that wasn’t what had happened.
At some point, even the most ardent liberal Hillary Clinton supporting Democrat has to begin wondering if they can continue to support these liars. Don’t they?





 Contributors: http://eaglerising.com/28785/rep-trey-gowdy-journalist-sharyl-attkisson-and-the-benghazi-families-unite-against-hillary-clinton/

Monday, October 19, 2015

House Just Passed “Donald Trump Act” – Sends Big Message to Obama!


Love him or hate him, Donald Trump is shining a massive spotlight on President Barack Obama’s amnesty agenda.
Trump knows that the border is so unprotected that dangerous criminals and terrorists can cross into America with ease.
That’s why the U.S. House of Representatives just issued a major defeat to Obama! Known as the “Donald Trump Act,” House Resolution 3099 takes direct aim at cities which don’t enforce federal laws about sanctuary cities.
The House passed it by an overwhelming 241-197 vote. This is a big deal!
Sanctuary cities have come under heavy scrutiny in the wake of Kathryn Steinle’s death on July 1 in San Francisco. Authorities charged Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez with her killing. Lopez-Sanchez, who is in the U.S. illegally, has a history of felony convictions and has been deported five times.
Critics of the sanctuary laws say such policies encourage people to immigrate to the U.S. illegally at the expense of citizens.
“A refuge for whom? A sanctuary for whom?” Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said. “A sanctuary for Kate Steinle? Or a refuge for a convicted felon with a 25-year-long criminal history?”
Democrats accused House Republicans of bringing up the bill in part because of real estate mogul and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s focus on illegal immigration and sanctuary cities; they dubbed the bill the “Donald Trump Act.”
“Just a few weeks into his campaign and Donald Trump has a bill on the floor of the House. That is better than some of the senators he’s running against.” Rep. Luis GutiĆ©rrez (D-Ill.) said mockingly.
via The Hill
Democrats can mock this legislation all they want. It’s clear that Republicans are getting serious about exposing the shameful problems caused by millions of illegal aliens flooding into this country.
Do you support the Donald Trump Act? Please leave us a comment (below) and tell us what you think.

 
 

Saturday, October 3, 2015