Someone Spilled the Beans on Ted Cruz-WHO?

So who Spilled the Beans on Ted Cruz with the National Enquirer. Why hasn't he threatened to sue? We don't believe Trump or Stone were the culprits. It originally was put out by Rubio from all accounts. We look for something big to break this weekend.

The National Enquirer is indeed a tabloid – and as such there are various grains of salt that should be applied when reviewing anything they present.

However, that said, they have been unfortunately accurate for more than a few presidential hopefuls:  Gary Hart, Jesse Jackson and John Edwards to name a few of the more infamous examples.

A Washington Times writer was abruptly fired after he “came clean” on Twitter about the Ted Cruz sex scandal. The "scandal" involves Ted Cruz cheating on his wife with up to five mistresses, including at least one who was married with children!  This, as Cruz, dares to portray himself a Good Christian . . . . to deceive Evangelicals and win their votes!
The writer, Drew Johnson, confirmed via his Twitter account that there was some truth to the Ted Cruz affair rumors noting that he knows, at least, two of the mistresses named by theNational Enquirer are accurate. The columnist says that other media outlets, columnists and reporters knew about the affairs, but refused to run the story.
The National Enquirer has caused a media firestorm after publishing a cover story about GOP presidential hopeful Ted Cruz and a series of alleged mistresses. The publication is a known tabloid, but despite its reputation for the sensational, has broke a number of big stories related to political candidates and high-profile cases in the past. For example, the National Enquirer was the first to break stories about Gary Hart, Jesse Jackson and John Edwards before they were confirmed by the mainstream media. Therefore, when the tabloid decided to run with a story about Ted Cruz and his rumored “five mistresses,” it left some questioning if the bombshell report could be true.
In response to the story in question, a Washington Times columnist responded that it is not entirely bogus as from “what he knows” at least two of the mistresses outlined in the report are “accurate.”

Ted Cruz Sex Scandal! Said at least two mistresses "accurate"

Hillary Clinton: 'Serial Liar' - Lying Compilation

Obama Claims to have taught Constitutional Law, but Here’s What He Really did at the University of Chicago

During a townhall meeting on guns, which I wrote about here, Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah said, "I believe in the Second Amendment. It is there, written on the paper. It guarantees a right to bear arms. No matter how many times people try to twist my words around — I taught constitutional law, I know a little bit about this — I get it." However, one writer has sought to clarify that Obama was not actually a professor, which means he never taught constitutional law.

Karin McQuillan writes at American Thinker:

    Obama was never a professor; he was a lecturer.  He did not have the qualifications to be a professor.  Obama never published a single law paper.  He was hired by the University of Chicago when they learned he had been given a book contract on race and law directly after graduating from Harvard.  There was no book – just the contract, which he later reneged on.  This is not the normal level of accomplishment for a University of Chicago professor or even lecturer.

    Well, I suppose Obama's deception and outright lies are par for the course. So, no one is surprised by them. In fact, many have questioned his mental stability as a result of his chronic lying. The irony is that he has used the mental health issue to go after people's guns, especially our veterans.

    So, if he didn't actually teach constitutional law as he claims, then what did he do?

    McQuillan continues:

        Obama did not specialize in the Constitution.  Obama cared about and taught only one subject: race.  One course was about race in the Constitution.  It is on this flimsy basis that he attempts to pawn himself off as a constitutional scholar.

Contributor: http://freedomoutpost.com/2016/01/obama-claims-to-have-taught-constitutional-law-but-heres-what-he-really-did-at-the-university-of-chicago/

Why is Hillary Clinton so so unhappy?

Why is Hillary Clinton so unhappy? According to her, when she and her husband left the White House, they were dead broke. Yet they left with a truckload of valuable furniture, dinnerware and flatware that was the property of the federal government, for which they were never prosecuted.
They also left with contracts for lectures and speeches worth between $20 million and $30 million in the ensuing years. And they have done quite well financially. According to The Washington Post, between the time Bill Clinton left office in 2001 and January 2013, when Hillary Clinton stepped down as secretary of state, Bill alone made $104.9 million for speeches, and Hillary's standard speaking fee is $200,000 a pop.
Why is Hillary so unhappy? We can start with the fact that she is her own worst enemy. No Republican dirty trickster could have put her into the legal and political mess into which she has put herself. Her surreptitious refusal to follow federal law and her congenital lying about it have caught up with her.

By using her own computer server instead of the government's in the four years of her tenure as secretary of state, she knowingly compromised the national security of the United States. She did this by receiving and sending at least 400 emails that contained information that under federal law was confidential, secret or top-secret, which is a felony.
The failure to preserve data of that nature is a federal crime, whether it is stamped with an official secret denomination, whether one has read it and perceived its secret nature, and whether it has fallen into enemy hands or not. Gen. David Petraeus was convicted of retaining the printed versions of secret and top-secret data in a desk drawer in his guarded home. It was alleged -- but not proved -- that he shared this data with one of his subordinates. Even though the subordinate had a security clearance, Petraeus was prosecuted.
In Hillary's case, the data have fallen into enemy hands, as one of the folks to whom she regularly sent her emails -- in utter and reckless disregard for the secrets they contained -- was her political adviser Sid Blumenthal, an employee of the Clinton Foundation at the time. Blumenthal's insecure server was hacked by Romanian intelligence agents, who were convicted and sentenced to prison.
Why is Hillary so unhappy? When the State Department was sued by public interest groups seeking copies of Hillary's emails -- lawsuits permitted and even encouraged by the Freedom of Information Act, a federal statute that presumes that documents and emails in federal custody are available for the public to see -- the State Department answered the litigation truthfully by telling a federal judge that it had none of Hillary's emails.

As Dumb As She Is You Know She Was Hacked! Spam Sent to Hillary Clinton Server Prompts

Spam Sent to Hillary Clinton Server Prompts Look at Suspected Russian Hacking

WASHINGTON — It turns out that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private email account, like seemingly everyone else’s in America, was hit by spam sent to try to lure her into clicking on a malicious link — one that could have compromised the security of her communications when she was secretary of state.
But did that put her more at risk than if she had relied solely on the State Department’s internal systems? Almost certainly not. After all, in 2014 the unclassified email systems at the State Department and the White House were shut down, often for days at a time, as government security experts tried to erase the damage done by the hackers, suspected to be Russians, probably linked to the government.  It seems virtually certain, investigators say, that the offenders in that case siphoned vast numbers of emails out of both systems.

 
    Hillary Rodham Clinton before giving a speech at the Brookings Institution in Washington this month.
    3 Hillary Clinton Emails Deemed ‘Secret’ in State Dept. Review of 6,300 PagesSEPT. 30, 2015
    Huma Abedin, left, with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in New York in 2011.
    First Draft: Emails Show Hillary Clinton Adviser Sidestepping Potential ConflictSEPT. 28, 2015
    Hillary Rodham Clinton on Monday.
    String of Emails Raises Questions About When Hillary Clinton Began Using Personal AccountSEPT. 25, 2015
    The F.B.I. is investigating whether an aide improperly sent email on the unrest in Libya to Hillary Rodham Clinton in April 2011.
    Hillary Clinton Email Inquiry Weighs if Aides Erred at ‘Send’SEPT. 24, 2015

Still, the evidence that Mrs. Clinton’s personal account had been on the receiving end of a “spear phishing” attempt, revealed in a batch of her emails released by the State Department on Wednesday, raises the same question the F.B.I. is trying to answer as it combs through the forensic evidence from the server that was once in Mrs. Clinton’s basement.

And that is whether the attackers who successfully got into the unclassified systems at the State Department and the White House also got into Mrs. Clinton’s. She would have been a natural target for a state-sponsored cyberattack by adversaries who have made clear their determination to learn as much as they can about the inner workings of the United States government. And the possible vulnerability of her home-based system remains a central mystery in the investigations.

“It would stand to reason,” one person involved in the investigation said recently, “that anyone who had planted malware in the State Department system would have seen a very high-level official talking to other high-level officials, and followed the trail.” But, the person added, “we don’t know that happened.”

The person spoke on the condition of anonymity so as to not be identified discussing a continuing investigation.

Nick Merrill, a spokesman for the Clinton campaign, said there was no evidence that the system had ever been breached. “All these emails show is that, like millions of other Americans, she received spam,” he said.

There is also no evidence that the spammers who targeted her knew that it was the secretary of state at the other end of the attack. The fact that it was sent four times to her account over a period of hours suggests it was sent by an automated system.

Some experts disagree. Justin Harvey, the chief security officer of Fidelis Cybersecurity, said in an interview that “the chances are still quite high that it was humanly targeted.” In such an attack, the spam probably would have been sent first to her aides, in hopes of getting to her account.

But if Mrs. Clinton’s system was successfully pierced — perhaps in some other attack — Mrs. Clinton might well not have known it, either. Other email accounts, including one for her husband, Bill, the former president, resided on the same server in their basement of their home in Chappaqua, N.Y. No one has yet explained what kind of monitoring systems were on that server, if any.
Continue reading the main story
First Draft Newsletter

Eric H. Holder Jr., the previous attorney general, often said, “There are two kinds of companies in America: those who know they have been the subject of cyberattacks, and those who don’t know they have been the subject of cyberattacks.” That dictum seems to apply to the State Department as well.

It took officials there weeks or months to catch on to the attack, officials said this year. That is a pretty good record compared with the Office of Personnel Management, who did not know for more than a year that security dossiers on roughly 22 million Americans, and millions of fingerprints, had been secretly transmitted to servers in China.

If Mrs. Clinton felt safer on her own system than on the State Department’s, she was hardly alone. One of Mrs. Clinton’s top policy aides, Anne-Marie Slaughter, noted in another email released Wednesday that “State’s technology is so antiquated that NO ONE uses a State-issued laptop, and even high officials routinely end up using their home email accounts to be able to get their work done quickly and effectively.”

What was true in 2011 remains true today. The State Department on Thursday confirmed a report in The Boston Globe that Secretary of State John Kerry had occasionally received work related emails on a personal account.

“This is an acknowledgment of the reality that Secretary Kerry has decades-old friendships, and those friends have emailed him on a personal account for years,” said John Kirby, a spokesman for the State Department. Mr. Kerry has taken several steps to ensure that he complied with federal record-keeping rules, the State Department said, adding that it has a process in place to review Mr. Kerry’s personal emails to make sure they are forwarded to his work account and backed up on a federal record-keeping system.

The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, said Thursday that he was certain the bureau would be able to complete the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s personal email account in a timely manner and that he would make sure politics did not interfere with it.

“I am following this very closely, and I get briefed on it regularly,” Mr. Comey told reporters at F.B.I. headquarters.

The F.B.I. opened its investigation into how classified materials were handled in connection with Mrs. Clinton’s account in response to a referral from the inspector general for the intelligence community after sensitive national security information was found on the account. It is illegal to have classified information on an unsecured network.

Mr. Comey declined to discuss the specifics of the inquiry, but said that one of the reasons he has a 10-year term as director was “to make sure this organization stays outside of politics.”
Correction: October 3, 2015

A headline on Friday with an article about Hillary Rodham Clinton’s email server overstated what is known about an investigation into the server’s security. As the article correctly noted, Mrs. Clinton received spam email that was intended to place malware on her computer network; the investigation has not yet determined that the malware effort was successful.

Amazon Trade-in: Get Top Dollar for Your Phone

Visit Our Daily Newsletter at TheRedPill.Website

Buy me!